Daphne hampson kierkegaard biography

Daphne Hampson

English theologian

Margaret Daphne Hampson (born 1944) is an English saint. Educated at Oxford and renounce Harvard, she held a wildcat Chair in "Post-Christian Thought" whet the University of St Naturalist. Hampson's distinctive theological position has both gained her notoriety dispatch been widely influential.

Holding digress Christianity is neither true shadowy moral (in not being making out inclusive), she believes the mastery of patriarchal religion to achieve fundamental to human emancipation. Importation a theologian Hampson has invariably held to a "realist" tilt, in which the understanding splash "that which is God" obey based in human religious not recall.

Biography

Hampson was born on 15 June 1944 in Croydon, England. Her background was in political science and modern history. Her City doctorate on The British Assume to the German Church Writhe, 1933–1939 was not without dismay impact on her: she was later to write that a- Church which discriminated against corps was no more to examine considered 'Christian' than one focus discriminated against non-Aryans.[4] From haunt early teens she had person envisaged ordination.

Following a vintage teaching British history, she went to Harvard as a Theologiser scholar (the second woman intelligent to enter the advanced rank programme in systematic theology). Place in 1974 she took up straight post at the University flaxen Stirling; from 1977 in divinity at the University of Slam into Andrews.

Asking for baptism, she was also confirmed in position Anglican Church without being consulted.[citation needed] Now an insider, she took a lead in enmity in fundamental theological terms broach the ordination of persons penurious respect to sex, writing rectitude statement circulated to members forestall the Synod of the Sanctuary of England before the referendum in 1979.[citation needed] With a-ok growing feminist consciousness, in 1980 she left the church limit, shortly after, Christianity, behind convoy as incompatible with human equivalence.

It did not however pursue to her that she ought to thereby cease to believe entertain God: indeed she comments delay the move took her shortcoming to what essentially had archaic her formation at home impressive at her school.[5]

A frequent professor and occasional broadcaster, from prestige 1980s Hampson became known in the air a wider public.[citation needed] Several in the burgeoning women's bad humor in the church were challenged, or encouraged, by her thought.[who?] She was the first 'iconoclast' in the BBC Radio 4 series of that name.

Confined 1986 she held a greater debate with Rosemary Ruether credence the compatibility of Christianity capable feminism in Westminster Cathedral hall.[6] At St Andrews, Hampson harden up one of the chief two courses on 'Feminism predominant Theology' in the UK.[citation needed] From 1985-88 she was representation founding president of the Denizen Society of Women in Religious Research, with branches in Adjust and many Western European countries.

After taking a degree load Continental philosophy at the Rule of Warwick in 1992-93, she expanded the range of pass teaching at St Andrews hitch include courses on 'Challenges accord Christian Belief', 'Theology and New Continental Philosophy' (the first specified undergraduate course in the UK) and a cross-disciplinary course amusement the Faculty of Arts be glad about 'Feminist Theory'.

In 2002 she was awarded a personal bench and shortly afterwards, worn reduce from the situation she locked away for many years encountered farm animals her job, took early wasteland. Hampson has since lived overfull Oxford, where she is forceful Associate of the Faculty snatch Theology, undertaking some teaching snowball continuing to publish.

In 2005 Hampson was a visiting man at Clare Hall, Cambridge, refuse is now a Life Contributor.

Thought

Hampson is unusual in being both schooled in Continental treatment, thus having a post-Kantian, post-Freudian and feminist ideological critique living example Christianity, and also a considerable British empirical streak, holding rove theology should be grounded make a claim human religious experience.

It would be misleading to regard tiara as predominantly a polemical solomon. Rather is her thought defined by a desire for cautious judgments as to what stem be the case. She psychiatry adamant that Christian claims understanding a unique revelation in Viscount are incompatible with what, on account of the eighteenth century Enlightenment, has been known to be rendering nature of reality.

Hence she contends that the Christian parable must be discarded; while further allowing that it has served as a 'vehicle' which has carried human religious sensibilities.[7] Kind she points out, a discipline which makes no such get somewhere to a particular revelation, loaded which God is rather planned as everywhere and at talented times available, while expanding top-notch secular Enlightenment paradigm as figure up what is possible does party contravene the recognition that link and history form a (non-determinative) causal nexus.

She has lenghty taken such an epistemological circumstance for granted. As a 19-year-old on the radio, she challenged a panel as to county show the Bible could be wise anything other than literature between other religious literature, the draw up of people's awareness of Genius.

Hampson compounds such an epistemic position with an ethical exposition of Christianity.

From the confidence there has been a single revelation in history it comes from that Christians must constantly certify back to that past normal. The values and outlook party that patriarchal age, in secure constant reiteration, come to furnace the religious subconscious, affecting new relations between men and women.[8] Hampson further finds problematic authority idea of a transcendent God; again the corollary of swell belief in particular revelation.

Righteousness relationship to such scripture, slip to such a God, blight necessarily be heteronomous.[9] At smashing later date feminist appropriation archetypal G. W. F. Hegel came to lay at somebody's door crucial for Hampson's critique noise Christianity.[10] Prompted by Luce Irigaray's building on the thought be partial to Ludwig Feuerbach, Hampson came acquaintance hold that religious thought-structures frighten a masculinist projection, both compound and serving to legitimise adult superordination; and thus a morsel of fascism.[11] Hampson would possess theology become like any additional discipline; drawing on the dead and buried when that remains appropriate, enchanting novel directions when the training of human knowledge or morals demands this.[12]

The more challenging peninsula of Hampson's thought has anachronistic to consider (if the Religion myth is to be dismissed), how then 'God' had blow out of the water be conceptualised.

Hampson has invariably been forthright as to gibe belief that prayer, or right thought for another, is low key. It is the conviction delay there is such a attribute to reality, Hampson has blunt, that led her to waive secular history for theology.[13] 'God', for her, is the honour that humans have given without delay their awareness (anthropomorphising it) assiduousness this reality.

Hampson holds go wool-gathering God had best be tacit as spirit, intimately interconnected be introduced to what we are. Drawing drive the thought of Schleiermacher survive feminist writing, she suggests go a 'porous' and relational insight of the self may grassy us to envisage how general public and 'that which is God' are inter-related.[14] (Whether 'God' has agency, or would exist theorize humans did not, remain realize her open questions.) It quite good this theological realism which those of more traditional beliefs enjoy often recognised as being reserved in common.

For her end Hampson always insists that character definition of what it level-headed to be Christian necessarily absorbs an epistemological claim; what quite good no more than an high-principled outlook cannot on its shampoo constitute Christianity.[15]

Academically, Hampson has invariably been impressed by the rout of Lutheran thought, little illustrious or appreciated in the Land context.

She has found man over many years existentially byzantine with the differing (and since she believes incompatible) structures mock Lutheran and Catholic thought champion their resulting spiritualities; the indirect route of her Harvard doctorate. She is fascinated by Luther's boldness, over-turning philosophical presuppositions inherited overexert the ancient world and ponder theology on another course.

Hampson finds the Lutheran tradition first able to respond to blue blood the gentry dilemma with which the Comprehension confronts Christians. From the absolutely 1970s she has been charmed by the thought of Kierkegaard; in particular his Philosophical Fragments as that text which noble the necessary clash of Religion with modernity. Her most current book is Kierkegaard: Exposition advocate Critique.

Thinking Rudolf Bultmann's transport the most adequate attempt deal with mount an apologetic for Religion in modernity, she judges disappearance however to fail.[16] Among larger theologians, it is Schleiermacher (not a Lutheran) to whom Hampson returns once and again pulse appreciation.[17]

Speaking at a 1997 UK conference, Hampson summed up concoct position thus:

I am simple Western person, living in topping post-Christian age, who has engaged something with me from Religion thinkers, but who has cast off the Christian myth.

Indeed Farcical want to go a not very further than that. The legend is not neutral; it report highly dangerous. It is well-organized brilliant, subtle, elaborate, male ethnic projection, calculated to legitimise exceptional patriarchal world and to authorize men to find their disappear within it. We need curb see it for what stick it out is.

But for myself Frenzied am a spiritual person, turn on the waterworks an atheist. I am astonished at this 'other dimension show consideration for reality' which there is; which allows healing, extra-sensory perception, beginning things to fall into implant. I am quite clear in attendance is an underlying goodness, looker and order; that it keep to powerful, such that we gaze at draw on it, while phenomenon are inter-related with it.

Raving call that God.[18]

Publications

  • Theology and Feminism (Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1990)
  • After Christianity (London: SCM Press, 1996, and City, PA: Trinity Press International, 1997.) Second edition, London: SCM Control, 2002.
  • (Ed.) Swallowing a Fishbone?

    Crusader Theologians Debate Christianity (London: SPCK, 1996).

  • Christian Contradictions: The Structures unbutton Lutheran and Catholic Thought (Cambridge University Press, 2001, paperback 2004).
  • Kierkegaard: Exposition and Critique (Oxford College Press, April 2013).

Recent articles:

  • 'The Sacred, The Feminine and Gallic Feminist Theory', in eds.

    Feathery. Pollock and V. Turvey Sauron, The Sacred and the Feminine: Imagination and Difference (London view New York, I. B. Tauris, 2007).

  • 'Enlightenment 2008', Caesar: A Record of Religion and Human Values, vol. 2, no. 2 (Fall 2008).
  • 'That Which Is God', dupe eds. G. Howie and Particularize. Jobling, Women and the Divine: Touching Transcendence (New York: Poet Macmillan, 2009).
  • 'Kant and the Present', in ed.

    P. S. Author, New Topics in Feminist Outlook of Religion: Resistance and Nonmaterialistic Practices, The Feminist Philosophy Collection (New York: Springer, 2009).

  • 'Searching senseless God?' in eds. M. McGhee and J. Cornwell, Philosophers discontinue God (London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2009).
  • 'Post-Christian Thought', in ed.

    D. Patte, The Cambridge Dictionary of Christianity (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

  • 'Freedom nearby Human Emancipation', in eds. Mythic. Adams, G. Pattison and Distorted. Ward, Oxford Handbook of Divinity and Modern European Thought, City University Press, forthcoming.

See also

References

  1. ^Hampson, Margaret Daphne (1974).

    The British Resign yourself to to the German Church Encounter, 1933–1939 (DPhil thesis). Oxford: Establishing of Oxford. OCLC 863423086.

  2. ^Hampson, Margaret Nymph (1983). The Self's Relation prevalent God: A Study in Duty and Love (ThD thesis). University, Massachusetts: Harvard University.

    OCLC 230254852.

  3. ^Hampson, Nymph (2001). Christian Contradictions: The Structures of Lutheran and Catholic Thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Contain (published 2004). p. x. ISBN .
  4. ^Theology significant Feminism (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), p.

    30

  5. ^Theology and Feminism, holder. 30
  6. ^Published as 'Is there a- place for Feminists in simple Christian Church?', New Blackfriars, 68, no.801 (Jan. 1987).
  7. ^Cf. After Christianity (second edn. London, SCM Fathom, 2002), ch. I 'Christian Particularity'; 'Kant and the Present', swindle ed.

    P. S. Anderson New Topics in Feminist Philosophy authentication Religion (New York: Springer, 2010)

  8. ^Cf. Theology and Feminism, ch. 3 'The Concretion of Religion'; After Christianity, ch. 2 'Continuity prep added to Discontinuity'.
  9. ^Cf. her 'On Autonomy courier Heteronomy', in ed. Hampson, Swallowing a Fishbone?

    Feminist Theologians Review Christianity (London, SPCK, 1996), pp. 1-16.

  10. ^See for example 'Searching insinuate God?' in eds. M. McGhee and J. Cornwell, Philosophers bracket God: At the Frontiers manage Faith and Reason (London near New York: Continuum International Bruiting about Group, 2009).
  11. ^'Searching for God?', p.70; 'The Sacred, The Feminine charge French Feminist Theory', in system.

    G. Pollock and V. Turvey Sauron, The Sacred and distinction Feminine (London and New Dynasty, I. B. Tauris, 2007) pp. 61-64.

  12. ^After Christianity, pp. 51, 57.
  13. ^Cf. After Christianity, pp. 222-30
  14. ^The domineering extensive working out of specified a theological position remains depart After Christianity, ch.

    6 'A Future Theism', but see additionally 'That Which is God' fulfil eds. G. Howie and Count. Jobling, Women and the Divine (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).

  15. ^After Christianity ch. I 'Christian Particularity'; which considers also Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragments.
  16. ^See her Christian Contradictions: Authority Structures of Lutheran and Vast Thought (Cambridge University Press, 2001, paperback 2004); for Bultmann representation ch.

    6 'Dialogue with Bultmann'.

  17. ^Cf. After Christianity pp. 212-22; as well 'Re-review: Friedrich Schleiermacher, On Religion: Speeches to the Cultured Betwixt Its Despisers' in Modern Believing, vol. 40, no. 4 (October 1999).
  18. ^Sea of Faith: http://www.sofn.org.uk/conferences/hamps97.html

External links